The 2ND: GUN RIGHTS, NOT GUN PERMITS!

House Committee Advances Amended Senate Bill 25-3 on Semiautomatic Firearm Ban

As of March 13, 2025

This bill is an unnecessary attack on Second Amendment rights, burdening law-abiding Coloradans with excessive red tape and costs. The vague sheriff discretion threatens due process, while diverting wildlife funds for startup costs misuses resources. It’s a backdoor restriction masked as safety, ignoring the rights of responsible gun owners and setting a dangerous precedent for government overreach. Furthermore, this bill represents The Elitists in The Denver Metro agenda, NOT The People of Colorado.

Overview

  – Senate Bill 25-3 regulates sales of semiautomatic firearms with detachable magazines in Colorado.

  – Passed House Judiciary Committee on March 11, 2025, with a 7-4 vote after 12 hours of testimony.

  – All four committee Republicans voted no; most witnesses opposed the bill, rallying outside the Capitol.

Legislative Journey

  – Originally a broad ban, amended in the Senate after talks with Gov. Jared Polis’ office.

  – Senate approved it in February (19-15); now includes a permitting process instead of an outright ban.

Key Provisions

  – Buyers need sheriff approval, a safety course (4 or 12 hours, based on hunter safety certification), and a test for a 5-year eligibility card.

  – Applies to semiautomatic rifles, shotguns, and pistols with detachable magazines.

  – Does not restrict possession; effective September 2025 if passed.

Sponsors and Purpose

  – Sponsored by Reps. Andrew Boesenecker (Fort Collins) and Meg Froelich (Englewood), Sens. Tom Sullivan (Centennial) and Julie Gonzales (Denver), all Democrats.

  – Aims to reinforce the 2013 high-capacity magazine ban, per supporters.

Amendments in Committee

  – Removed fingerprinting for background checks; now requires photo ID and name-based Colorado criminal/judicial record check.

  – Sheriffs can deny applicants if “reasonable belief” exists that past behavior indicates danger to self or others.

  – Due process concerns raised; sponsors plan House floor amendment to address this.

  – Sheriffs may set vetting fees.

Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) Role

  – Oversees application process, safety course design, and fees.

  – Amendment allows CPW to borrow from Outdoor Recreation and Wildlife Cash Funds for startup costs, repayable by 2030.

  – Republicans, like Rep. Matt Soper (Delta), questioned legality of using these funds, meant for hunting licenses and parks.

Concerns:

  – Republicans, including Asst. Minority Leader Ty Winter (Trinidad), criticized it as a Second Amendment infringement and a costly burden (training and sheriff fees).

  – Concerns over CPW capacity, potential backlogs, and diversion from its core mission.

Next Steps

  – Heads to House Finance Committee; likely to pass House with 43-22 Democratic majority if it reaches the floor.

PLEASE CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVE AND VOICE YOUR POSITION:

https://leg.colorado.gov/agencies/house-representatives/all-representatives

Leave a comment

Minimum 4 characters